China suspected Ukraine of unwillingness to give credit grain Corporation
Uncategorized December 7, 2017KIEV. 7 Dec. UNN. Visit of Chinese government delegation in Ukraine is associated in particular with the fact that China doubted the intention to give Ukraine a loan of 1.5 billion dollars, which was issued by the state food in 2012. About it writes the edition “Economic news”, reports UNN.
“According to the source, close to negotiating process between SFGCU (State food and grain Corporation of Ukraine) and Chinese partners, the situation is tense to the limit. China is literally in the categorical form has demanded a meeting with Prime Minister Groisman, and if “common ground will never be found, Ukraine is on the brink of a loud, you can say, global credit scandal,” said the media.
See ALSO: state food being prepared for privatization
Suspicion of the Chinese side associated with the actions of the new acting Chairman of the grain Corporation Dmitry Gavrish.
According to the newspaper, he began the process of active modernization of individual enterprises, members of the state food. However, these enterprises by the courts to be transferred to the management of “Bread of Ukraine”.
“…scared of the lender the fact that large amounts of state funds for Gavras spending on factories, which are now actively removed from the control of state food with the aim of further privatization. This occurs by litigation between the Corporation and DAK “Bread of Ukraine”, in which DPZKU deliberately loses. The Chinese side, at the same time, well aware that if you withdraw from the control of the grain Corporation’s main production facilities, the loan and its empty (the company-lender) to pay no one will have” – note the “Economic news”.
Recall, as reported UNN, on December 5, a Chinese government delegation headed by Vice-Premier of the state Council of China MA Kai has met with the Prime Minister of Ukraine Volodymyr Groisman.
Also recall that the acting Chairman GPZK Dmitry Gavrish was appointed to this position by the Cabinet in violation of procedures. Earlier this person worked in the company “Mostostroy” former regions of Vladimir Prodivus and probably was involved in criminal proceedings upon evasion from payment of taxes.